Former Minister Freeland Expresses Doubt About Ottawa’s Deal With China
.
Former Liberal MP and cabinet minister Chrystia Freeland says Ottawa should be skeptical of commitments from Beijing, as it has committed human rights violations and can’t be considered a reliable partner.
Freeland said that when China talks to countries like Canada, it casts itself as “the reliable partner” and as a country that “middle powers” like Canada can trust. She said China is portraying that “if you do a deal with China, it’s a deal that has meaning.”
“China is also casting itself as the defender of this international order based on rules that the U.S. created,” Freeland said. “My own view is we need to be a little bit skeptical of commitments from China to do that.”
“International experts concluded that their treatment amounted to torture,” Freeland said. “That is not the behaviour of a reliable partner.
‘Eyes Open’
Researchers at the Montreal Institute for Global Security (MIGS) said at a Feb. 17 press conference, releasing the findings of their latest report on transnational repression in Canada, that as Canada looks to diversify its trade partners, it can’t be “naive” in dealing with the Chinese regime, which is a leading perpetrator of transnational repression.“We have to keep our eyes open. We can’t close our eyes to the authoritarian threat that China represents,” MIGS co-founder and executive director Kyle Matthews said. “Many countries around the world that deal with transnational repression will tell you that China is one of the biggest players, if not the biggest player.”
“They don’t have an independent judiciary, they don’t have civilian oversight of law enforcement, they don’t respect human rights, they’re actively perpetrating genocide, among other crimes against humanity,” Cooper said.
Public Safety Minister Gary Anandasangaree has said under the agreement, the two countries would cooperate on issues such as curtailing fentanyl from coming into Canada.
Ottawa has not made the agreement public, while Tories are pushing to be able to review the agreement.
.


