Trade Minister Warned About China’s ‘Economic Coercion’ in Briefing by Global Affairs
Upon assuming the role in March, International Trade Minister Maninder Sidhu was briefed by Global Affairs on Canada’s efforts to diversify away from China, citing Beijing’s “economic coercion” and “pervasive” non-market practices, according to recently released documents.
“China also leverages its dominant market position in strategic sectors to advance its policy goals, including through the leveraging of trade dependencies in import and exports and where it holds a critical place in global supply chains,” reads the document.
“Canada has been the target of China’s economic coercion, where our domestic canola industry was targeted between 2019 and 2022 amid the Two-Michaels/Meng Wanzhou affair.”
The document also warns against China’s “pervasive” use of unfair or non-market practices, such as “subsidization, forced technology transfers, and insufficient labour standards (forced labour) and environmental standards,” which Ottawa says has created global market distortions.
Beijing has on various occasions targeted that industry during periods of diplomatic or trade tension with Ottawa.
More recently, Beijing has twice targeted Canada’s canola industry with tariffs this year, amid ongoing trade disputes with Ottawa.
The March briefing document to Sidhu says his role as international trade minister is to navigate three primary challenges, including “protecting economic security from risks, including economic coercion and non-market trading practices.” The other two challenges involve Canada-U.S. trade and advancing export diversification.
The document notes that while China remains an “important export destination” because of its market size, it is a “challenging” environment for Canadian businesses due to issues like investment restrictions, intellectual property theft, and the use of forced labour.
It adds that China relies on strong imports to compensate for challenges to its economy, such as an aging population, weak real estate and labour markets, and low domestic consumption.
What's Your Reaction?
Like
0
Dislike
0
Love
0
Funny
0
Wow
0
Sad
0
Angry
0



Comments (0)