China’s New Five-Year Plan Falls Far Short of the Economy’s Needs
.
Meetings at the Chinese Communist Party’s (CCP’s) so-called Fourth Plenum have given birth to a new five-year plan for the Chinese economy. It promises a great deal: that China will at last become self-sufficient in advanced technologies, that Chinese consumers will find new spending vigor, that Beijing in the future will pay closer attention to supply and demand, that China will gain still more international influence, and that the country will invest more in emerging industries.
Most of this is merely an extension of what Beijing has been doing for some time now, with mixed results at best. Otherwise, the plan says less about specific steps and policies and more about what Beijing would like to happen. It falls far short of what China’s economy needs.
According to a translation of the plan’s Mandarin-language summary, it promises to “adhere to the strategic point of expanding domestic demand” and “vigorously boost consumption.” The planners make clear that China will achieve these goals through investment projects in public services, urban planning, and elderly care, and not with a “bold, direct push to expand consumption itself.”
Apart from such help for the Chinese consumer, the plan reaffirms the years-long goal of achieving self-reliance in advanced technologies, such as quantum computing, electric vehicles, batteries, semiconductor manufacturing, biotechnologies, and hydrogen power.
The tech investment part of the plan is entirely an extension of what China has been doing for the past two years or so. Even if successful, it is hardly enough to move the economy. At last measure, the areas identified for emphasis amount to a mere 3.5 percent of China’s gross domestic product (GDP).
On the consumer side, this plan seems to promise a surge in spending more than it offers a means to induce it. The property crisis has so depressed real estate prices that, according to calculations by the Foreign Policy Institute and others, Chinese households have lost the equivalent of some $18.1 trillion in net worth. And since, in most cases, the family home constitutes the bulk of a Chinese household’s net worth, real estate losses have all but decimated the Chinese middle class. Little wonder then that Chinese people have become wary of spending. So far, government subsidies for purchases of home appliances and automobiles have failed to overcome this reluctance.
Yet, as already stated, the plan gives households no direct income support. To be sure, the promised increases in urban planning, infrastructure, and elderly care can offer Chinese households some relief, but the extreme net worth setback these households have suffered would seem to demand more robust remedies, a fact to which the failure of the CCP’s programs to boost consumption also testifies.
Perhaps some relief for China’s beleaguered economy will emerge from the trade talks between U.S. Treasury Secretary Scott Bessant and Chinese Vice Minister He Lifeng held recently in Malaysia and the face-to-face meeting between U.S. President Donald Trump and CCP leader Xi Jinping during the Asia-Pacific Economic Cooperation Summit in South Korea. But the much-anticipated five-year plan offers little about which to become excited.


