Sen. Schmitt Introduces Legislation to Protect Americans From China’s Lawfare
.
Sen. Eric Schmitt (R-Mo.) has introduced legislation to protect Americans from what he calls China’s “lawfare” campaign, following a $50 billion lawsuit recently filed against him in a Chinese court.
“My bill makes clear that no politically motivated judgement issued by a Chinese court will ever be recognized or enforced in the United States. Chinese lawfare has no place in America,” he said.
Schmitt reaffirmed his stance on filing the 2020 lawsuit, saying that he “sued China and won because the facts were on my side: China lied about COVID, tried to cover it up, failed, and plunged the world into a painful global pandemic.”
Schmitt’s legislation says China’s judicial system is “constitutionally subordinate” to the Chinese Communist Party (CCP), which uses Chinese courts as “instruments of state policy,” including by retaliating against foreign officials, governments, businesses, and individuals.
“Politically-motivated foreign judgments pose a direct threat to democratic governance and judicial integrity whenever foreign courts are used to punish speech or official action protected under United States law,” the bill states.
If enacted, a Chinese court judgement won’t be allowed to be enforced in the United States if it is determined to have been “initiated, controlled, or materially supported” by the CCP and was motivated to retaliate against protected political speech, U.S. government authority, or U.S. constitutional rights.
Any effort to enforce the Chinese rulings in a state court could be transferred to a federal court, according to the bill.
The legislation includes a “fee-shifting” provision, enabling U.S. defendants to recover reasonable attorneys’ fees, legal costs, and expert fees incurred while challenging Chinese court rulings.
The U.S. Attorney General is authorized to intervene in these cases and submit a “statement of interest,” such as U.S. foreign policy interests or the political motivations of the Chinese court, a filing to which U.S. judges must give “substantial weight,” according to the bill.


