Carney’s Beijing Visit Sends a ‘Deeply Troubling Signal’: China Watchers Alarmed by PM’s Trip

Carney’s Beijing Visit Sends a ‘Deeply Troubling Signal’: China Watchers Alarmed by PM’s Trip

.

Chinese Canadian pro-democracy activist Sheng Xue says the timing of Prime Minister Mark Carney’s visit to China next week “sends a deeply troubling signal,” given the United States, Canada’s closest ally, is taking action to curb the regime’s reach in the Western Hemisphere.

Carney will meet with Chinese leader Xi Jinping, Premier Li Qiang, and business leaders during his visit to China from Jan. 13 to Jan. 17, the Prime Minister’s Office (PMO) said. Discussions are expected to revolve around trade, energy, agriculture, and international security.
.
Carney’s trip will mark the first visit to China by a Canadian prime minister since Justin Trudeau visited in 2017. Trudeau had also been seeking closer relations with China at the time, including by pursuing a free trade agreement with Beijing.

Sheng said by developing deeper relations with the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) at a time when the United States is seeking to address authoritarian-aligned regimes in the West such as the one in Venezuela, Canada risks undermining coordination with its closest ally. Venezuela remained “economically viable largely because the Chinese Communist regime purchases the majority of its oil exports and provides critical financial and political support,” Sheng said.

The Trump administration launched a surprise operation in Venezuela, capturing its leader Nicolás Maduro and his wife on Jan. 3 and extraditing them to the United States, where they face multiple conspiracy charges, including narco-terrorism. U.S. Secretary of State Marco Rubio has said that among their concern was that, “you can’t turn Venezuela into the operating hub for Iran, for Russia, for Hezbollah, for China, for the Cuban intelligence agents that control that country.”

Sheng says that given the position the United States is taking on regimes like China, Canada shouldn’t be going in the opposite direction. “At a moment when democratic nations are increasingly confronting the global expansion and coercive behavior of the Chinese Communist tyranny, Canada appears to be moving in the opposite direction,” Sheng told The Epoch Times.

She noted that Canada “should have learned painful lessons” from past engagement with Beijing, including the arbitrary detention of Canadian citizens Michael Kovrig and Michael Spavor, interference in Canadian elections, intimidation of Chinese Canadian diaspora communities, transnational repression, intellectual property theft, and economic coercion.

“The CCP has consistently demonstrated that it operates as a communist tyranny, not a responsible international partner,” she said. “To overlook this record in pursuit of short-term economic gains is both strategically naïve and politically dangerous.”

Sheng said Beijing will exploit Carney’s visit for “domestic and international propaganda” by portraying it as evidence that Canada is “abandoning its principled stance” and returning to “pragmatic cooperation” with the CCP.

.

Prime Minister Mark Carney and the Canadian delegation sit down with Chinese leader Xi Jinping and the Chinese delegation at the start of a meeting in Gyeongju on Oct. 31, 2025. The Canadian Press/Adrian Wyld
.

‘A Double-Edged Sword’

Henry Chan, a spokesperson for pro-democracy group Saskatchewan Stands With Hong Kong, says when Canadian politicians visit China, “it’s always a double-edged sword.”

He told The Epoch Times on Jan. 8 that Carney’s visit to China presents a risk of Ottawa giving up more to Beijing than it gets in return, while at the same time the move could upset the United States.

Chan noted this move is risky as the United States is still Canada’s biggest trading partner. He referred to Statistics Canada’s data for Canadian international trade in October 2025, released Jan. 8, which indicates that although exports to the United States have declined in recent months, they still make up roughly 67 percent of Canada’s total exports. Comparatively, exports to China only make up approximately 5 percent of Canada’s total exports.

Chan also said that while Canada and the United States share many of the same values, China does not value human rights, the rule of law, or democracy. “They are quite hostile to us in terms of interfering in our democratic system, in our nominations, and pursuing transnational repression on Canadian soil,” he added.

Cheuk Kwan, co-chair of the Toronto Association for Democracy in China, told The Epoch Times that during Carney’s visit, China will likely reiterate its talking points, asking Canada “not to meddle into the controversial issues,” such as human rights, foreign interference, and harassment. However, these are “crucial points that Carney needs to emphasize,” Kwan said.

Pursuing Trade With Beijing

Former Canadian diplomat Michael Kovrig said in a Jan. 7 post on X that although Carney is seeking to “recalibrate relations” between Ottawa and Beijing through his visit to China next week, “the reality is that many of those challenges remain and are not going to go away.”

Kovrig said the risk of increasing trade with China is that the CCP has “a well established track record of using economic relationships, particularly economic dependence, for political leverage.”

Sheng also said Beijing will use the meeting with Carney to try to “extract concessions,” such as in technology transfer, resource access, market entry, or silence on human rights abuses, while offering little in return. “Such engagements historically benefit the CCP far more than democratic counterparts,” she added.

“More broadly, I am concerned that Prime Minister Carney appears insufficiently attentive to the depth and scale of [CCP] penetration and influence operations in Canada,” Sheng said, adding that economic engagement cannot be separated from national security, democratic sovereignty, and human rights considerations when dealing with communist regimes.

.

A building in a business park in Markham, Ont., is seen on Oct. 31, 2022, one of three locations in the Greater Toronto Area identified by Spain-based human rights group Safeguard Defenders as being among the sites of at least 53 unofficial police stations allegedly run by police bureaus in China. The Canadian Press/Cole Burston
.

Strained Relations

Carney has been seeking to repair ties with China since early on in his term as prime minister, amid trade tensions with the United States and a push to double Canada’s non-U.S. exports over the next decade.

Relations between Canada and China broke down in 2018 when Canada executed a U.S. extradition warrant for Huawei executive Meng Wanzhou, who was accused of fraud. In retaliation, China arbitrarily detained Kovrig and Spavor, keeping them in custody for more than 1,000 days.

These events led to a freeze in relations between Ottawa and Beijing and a recalibration by the Canadian government in terms of how it dealt with the Chinese regime. Those policy changes were formalized in Ottawa’s Indo-Pacific Strategy released in 2022, which identified China as an “increasingly disruptive global power.”
Amid efforts to repair ties with Beijing during Carney’s term, Foreign Affairs Minister Anita Anand visited China in mid-October 2025, after which she said Ottawa was in a “strategic partnership” with Beijing.” Anand also said Ottawa was approaching the relationship with “pragmatism.”

Chan noted that China also has a “strategic partnership” with North Korea and Russia. “Do we want to be framed in those contexts?” he said.

Framing Canada’s strategy as being “pragmatic” and necessary to diversify exports could be perceived as a sign of weakness by the Chinese regime, Mehmet Tohti, executive director of the Canada-based Uyghur Rights Advocacy Project, said after Carney met with Xi on the margins of the Asia-Pacific Economic Cooperation forum in late October 2025.

Sheng said that Canada needs to deepen cooperation with trusted democratic partners, diversify supply chains, and firmly resist totalitarian influence. Canada’s long-term economic recovery and resilience will not be achieved by depending on Beijing, she noted.

“Any engagement with Beijing must be highly restrained, transparent, and grounded in clearly defined red lines — not wishful thinking,” Sheng said.

Noé Chartier contributed to this report.
.