At Least One Credit Rating Agency Gets More Pessimistic About China
.
Throughout much of the past year, economic and financial analysts at S&P Global Ratings anticipated what could be described as a gradual improvement in China’s troubled economy. But the flow of data and the implications of Beijing’s policy choices have recently led to a more pessimistic assessment.
The primary source of pessimism is unsurprisingly the country’s property sector. With the failure of the giant developer Evergrande, China fell into a property crisis that has persisted for almost five years. There was some hope that matters were working themselves out early in 2025. S&P brightened its outlook, forecasting a property sales decline of only 3 percent for the year, a considerable improvement over 2024, which saw a sales decline of 12.9 percent.
But the improvements of early 2025 dissipated as the year progressed. By October, S&P analysts reduced their sales forecast for the year to an 8 percent decline. Things got so weak by the end of the year that these analysts settled on a 12.6 percent decline, bringing sales to 8.4 trillion yuan ($1.21 trillion), less than half the 18.2 trillion yuan figure in 2021, when the crisis began.
From this less-than-encouraging backdrop, analysts at S&P now look for residential real estate sales to decline between 10 and 14 percent in 2026, a slightly worse slide than in 2025 and extending the overall drop since 2021 to almost 60 percent. S&P does not offer a forecast of residential real estate prices, but facing such a sales decline, it is hard to see residential real estate values doing anything but falling further, causing more harm still to household net worth and the confidence of Chinese consumers.
Considering the agency’s obligation to rate the credit and prospects of property developers and China generally, the analysts working on this project have hinted at credit downgrades. They have identified four of the ten largest developers as likely to suffer a downgrade, excluding China Vanke, which last year asked to delay repayment of some of its debt.
What is more, Beijing, rather than supporting this important sector and Chinese consumers, has instead doubled down on promoting high-tech production capacities. Even an enlarged technology sector is far from enough to counterbalance the economic drag of the failing property sector.


