Why ASML Chipmaking Tools Remain China’s Core Bottleneck Despite Reports of EUV Progress

Why ASML Chipmaking Tools Remain China’s Core Bottleneck Despite Reports of EUV Progress
.
News Analysis

For weeks, Chinese state outlets have touted “major breakthroughs” in extreme-ultraviolet (EUV) lithography—the light-etching machines that make the world’s most advanced chips and the main choke point in Beijing’s semiconductor push.

Yet industry insiders, engineers, and analysts say the fanfare is wildly premature.

Beijing’s labs can now flash tiny bursts of EUV light, yet the country remains at least two decades—most experts say closer to three—from matching Advanced Semiconductor Materials Lithography (ASML), the Dutch firm that alone can mass-produce working EUV systems.

Industry insiders say that the regime’s showcase laboratory demos—while scientifically interesting—are miles from the factory-ready, nanometer-precision, defect-free equipment that chipmakers need. And deep-rooted problems such as corruption, talent flight, and a political system that punishes failure make that gap even harder to close.
EUV machines project 13.5-nanometer light to carve patterns just a few atoms wide, enabling the production of 5-nanometer and smaller chips. Because the United States has barred ASML from selling its top tools to China, Beijing’s chip dreams now hinge on building a domestic alternative.

A full EUV platform needs three subsystems to work in perfect sync: a powerful light source, high-precision mirrors, and an ultrastable stage that moves the silicon wafer. The light source is the hardest piece.

The global standard, pioneered by ASML, is an LPP (laser-produced plasma) source that fires a carbon dioxide (CO₂) laser at microscopic droplets of molten tin.

China’s leading LPP project sits inside the Shanghai Institute of Optics and Fine Mechanics (SIOM), headed by Lin Nan, a former ASML light-source scientist lured home in 2021.

Lin’s team in March reported 3.42 percent conversion efficiency and single-pulse energies above 20 millijoules—better than the 3.2 percent logged in 2019 by the Netherlands’s Advanced Research Centre for Nanolithography and Switzerland’s ETH Zurich’s 1.8 percent in 2021.

Conversion efficiency is the share of laser power that becomes usable EUV light, so at 3 percent, 97 percent is lost as heat or stray radiation; higher figures cut that waste and speed production.

State media hailed the numbers as “internationally advanced,” yet they still trail earlier lab marks—4.9 percent achieved at the University of Central Florida in 2007 and 4.7 percent set by Japan’s Utsunomiya University last year—and remain well below the roughly 5.5 percent efficiency of today’s best commercial CO₂-laser sources from companies such as ASML, the report stated.

Other Chinese institutes are testing alternative physics.

Harbin Institute of Technology (HIT) is reviving the older DPP (discharge-produced plasma) concept, which, in theory, is cheaper and more compact than LPP. But Cymer, a U.S.-based light source supplier later acquired by ASML in 2013, abandoned DPP years ago after it failed to deliver sufficient output power for high-volume chip production.

Researchers at the Guangdong Institute of Intelligent Manufacturing and Huazhong University of Science and Technology are experimenting with slim fiber-optic lasers that fire in rapid succession, hoping to avoid the huge CO₂ laser setup that ASML relies on.

Tsinghua University is trying the boldest idea so far. It wants to generate EUV light with a particle accelerator that produces a continuous stream of tightly packed light pulses, known as steady-state microbunching (SSMB) EUV.

Each early result of these Chinese experiments triggers headlines hinting that a homegrown EUV tool is just around the corner.

Industry Skepticism

Despite growing media speculation, ASML Chief Executive Christophe Fouquet remains doubtful of these claims.
“[It is] always possible to generate some EUV light, but it would take many, many years for China to make an EUV machine,” he said in an investors’ call in April.

Hsueh Tsung‑chih, a former procurement manager at Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Company (TSMC), the world’s leading chipmaker, echoed Fouquet’s assessment.

“Nearly every one of those Chinese headlines is wildly overstated and sensational,” he told The Epoch Times.

“If they truly have that capability, they’d keep quiet to avoid sanctions.”

Hsieh estimates China is at least 20 years from ASML’s current level.

“What they have now is lab‑controlled. In the lab, you can use enormous equipment and ignore cost just to get one successful shot,” he explained.

Turning that into a production tool—identical wafers, 24 hours a day—“can take 20 years and still fail,” he said. “Just like many professors publish great papers but can’t turn them into products.”

“Mass production means identical quality every second,” Hsueh added.

Lin Tsung-nan, an electrical-engineering professor at National Taiwan University, noted that ASML’s top EUV light source currently operates at 600 watts or higher, whereas the prototype in China’s HIT is reported to operate at under 100 watts.

“This is nowhere near the power needed on a real fab,” he told The Epoch Times, where at least 250 watts is typically required to achieve production-level throughput.

Li Kuan-hua, head of policy research at Taiwan’s Industrial Technology Research Institute, dismisses each Chinese claim as a mere “paper machine,” reminding that a factory-ready EUV system still needs flawless mirrors, vibration-free stages, and constant feedback from cutting-edge fabs—even if the light source itself were perfected.

“Especially at 3‑nm and 2‑nm nodes, where minuscule tolerances can ruin yields,” Li told The Epoch Times.

The yields refer to the share of wafers that meet tight performance specs during chip production.

He added that China’s most advanced foundry is currently stuck at a nominal 14-nanometer node, leaving no partner to refine the tool.

Why Talents—and Freedom—Matter

Building a lithography ecosystem, experts say, is as much about people and institutions as about physics.

“Science needs the freedom to fail,” Su Tzu-yun, director of Taipei’s Institute for National Defense and Security Research, told The Epoch Times.

Reverse-engineering works for an aircraft carrier, he said, but not for physics that lives at the scale of atoms.

Li adds that true lithography mastery demands the painstaking “craftsman spirit” seen in Japan—decades of repetition and simulation. In China, funding races often reward speed over rigor, pushing researchers to inflate claims.

That incentive system already spawned the “Big Fund” corruption scandal—the National Integrated Circuit Industry Investment Fund—through which Beijing poured tens of billions of dollars into domestic chip ventures like Tsinghua Unigroup, only to see it collapse within two years.
“Under one-party rule,” Su said, “no one is ever truly safe; the Chinese Communist Party can accuse anyone of leaking secrets, so top talent won’t stay.”

What ASML Actually Built

Money alone didn’t give ASML its edge. The Dutch company spent three years proving EUV could work and another 15 turning it into a factory workhorse, sharing data with customers like TSMC, Samsung, and Intel to fine-tune every glitch.

Hsueh said that patient, methodical culture is the opposite of Beijing’s habit of chasing shortcuts through IP theft or splashy acquisitions.

EUV technology requires petabytes—millions of gigabytes—of optical data gathered over decades, data that only ASML possesses. “Even if someone bought the company tomorrow,” Hsueh said, “their army of PhDs still couldn’t replicate the machine overnight.”

TSMC’s new fab in Arizona showed just how crucial tacit expertise can be, he said, with yields stuck in limbo until the company flew in hundreds of veteran engineers from Taiwan and shipped over its massive data archives.

“That soft power can’t be copied,” Hsueh noted.

China has thrived with low-barrier products like solar panels, he said, “but semiconductors are where it hits the wall.”

From 2019 to 2024, China’s share of the global lithography-tool market was “negligible,” according to the Center for Security and Emerging Technology, a U.S. think tank. The Netherlands dominates by supplying 79 percent of these machines, while Japan accounts for 17 percent.

Even in i-line lithography—the 365-nanometer tools used for older chips—China’s market share is only about 4 percent, the report stated. In cutting-edge EUV, it is virtually zero.

Li said U.S. export controls have slowed China’s progress to a crawl. As nations with 3- and 2-nanometer lines race ahead, “the gap will only widen.”

Su pegs the current lag at 30 years.

Even a few breakthroughs might shrink that to 20, he said, but the rest of the world will keep moving too. “The distance,” he said, “is likely to hold.”

Song Tang, Yi Ru, and Fei Chen contributed to this report.
.