With Landmark Law, Texas Deals Major Blow to Beijing’s Global Repression Tactics

With Landmark Law, Texas Deals Major Blow to Beijing’s Global Repression Tactics
Commentary

Texas’s Anti-Transnational Repression Act has officially become law, representing a significant step in the U.S. response to foreign authoritarian influence, with the most immediate consequences likely to affect the Chinese Communist Party (CCP).

The CCP’s methods of transnational repression pose a serious threat to American sovereignty. Existing U.S. federal tools, such as the Foreign Agents Registration Act (FARA), have proven ineffective in countering these tactics, but Texas’s new law helps fill that legal gap.

The law, signed by Gov. Greg Abbott on May 24 after passing both chambers of the state Legislature, adds two new criminal offenses to Texas law: transnational repression and the unauthorized enforcement of foreign law.

Transnational repression refers to actions taken by individuals under the direction of foreign governments or terrorist organizations to plan or carry out acts such as assault, harassment, stalking, human trafficking, coercion, or retaliation. These acts specifically target individuals for exercising their First Amendment rights.

The Act is set to take effect on Sept. 1, 2025. While broadly aimed at any foreign government involved in transnational repression, communist China is widely viewed as the primary concern. Unlike Russia and Iran, the CCP has a far greater number of proxies and affiliated organizations operating in the United States, along with a much larger Chinese diaspora community it has actively sought to influence and control.

CCP Targets Falun Gong

Targets of the CCP’s transnational repression include political dissidents, Tibetans, and Uyghurs, but its most consistent focus has been the Falun Gong community.

Falun Gong, also known as Falun Dafa, was introduced to the Chinese public in 1992 by Mr. Li Hongzhi. The spiritual practice is based on the principles of truthfulness, compassion, and forbearance.

Since 1999, the group has faced severe persecution from the CCP, including torture, kidnapping, killings, and forced organ harvesting.

The following are examples of how the CCP weaponizes the American legal system to conduct transnational repression against Falun Gong practitioners—a strategy it has pursued for years.

One notable case is that of Chen Jun, a prominent Chinese community leader in Los Angeles. Following the directives of the Chinese regime, Chen traveled to New York to bribe an IRS official in an attempt to revoke the nonprofit status of Shen Yun Performing Arts, a company founded by Falun Gong practitioners.

As it turned out, the intermediary he worked through was actually an FBI informant. From the start, Chen had walked into a sting operation. In November 2024, he was sentenced to 20 months in prison.

Another case involved an American citizen who had spent 15 years in China and presented himself as an environmentalist when he returned to the United States and founded an environmental nonprofit in New York. He then repeatedly filed lawsuits against Dragon Springs, the campus that houses Shen Yun Performing Arts’ training facilities, on environmental grounds. The court dismissed his claims multiple times due to a complete lack of evidence, and the judge barred him from filing any further suits on the same grounds.
In addition, two individuals associated with the now-exposed Chinese overseas police station in New York—Lu Jianwang, former president of the American Changle Association, and Chen Jinping, its secretary-general—were indicted. As early as 2015, Lu had received directives from CCP officials to lead efforts in Washington aimed at harassing Falun Gong practitioners. Chen pleaded guilty on Dec. 18, 2024, while Lu has pleaded not guilty and is awaiting trial.

Texas Fills Legal Gap

Penalties for crimes charged under FARA have historically been relatively light. This limitation highlights a broader problem: existing U.S. laws are poorly equipped to tackle the kind of brazen, shameless tactics the CCP employs. Historically, FARA has been focused less on criminal activity and more on transparency in lobbying and media work. As a result, a foreign agent can often comply with the law simply by registering and adding a disclosure—however small or inconspicuous—that their materials or activities are carried out on behalf of a foreign principal.

The Texas legislation fills not only a gap in state law but also a major void in federal law by treating transnational repression as a standalone criminal offense. Under this new law, individuals in Texas who act on behalf of the CCP to harass Chinese dissidents or Falun Gong practitioners are no longer seen as mere foreign agents—they are treated as active participants in the CCP’s overseas persecution and are subject to serious criminal charges.

By contrast, the Falun Gong Protection Act—which has passed the U.S. House and is now before the Senate—aims to sanction Chinese officials through visa bans and financial restrictions.

CCP’s Transnational Repression a Serious Violation of US Sovereignty

Why has the United States begun to take the Chinese regime’s transnational repression seriously? Because the CCP’s actions have already amounted to a grave violation of American sovereignty. Several notable cases highlight the different forms this repression can take.

Operation Fox Hunt

The U.S. Department of Justice has indicted—and subsequently secured convictions against—members of CCP-directed enforcement teams who attempted to coerce individuals to return to China. Carried out by the CCP’s Ministry of Public Security, this operation has seen Chinese agents conduct law enforcement activities on American soil without notifying U.S. authorities—a blatant violation of U.S. sovereignty.

Overseas Police Stations

The operators of the CCP’s now-exposed “police station” in New York were the former president and secretary-general of the American Changle Association—a case reported by The Epoch Times in late May.  Acting under orders from China’s public security apparatus, these so-called police stations represent yet another unlawful extension of CCP authority in the United States.

‘Mass Mobilization’ Tactic

The third tactic involves exporting Mao Zedong-era “mass mobilization” strategies abroad. In a campaign reminiscent of the Cultural Revolution, the CCP indoctrinates ordinary Chinese nationals and mobilizes them to act as informal enforcers of Party discipline overseas.

Although this form of repression has received relatively little attention in the United States, an article published by the Public Security Studies–Journal of Zhejiang Police College provides a detailed account of how China’s public security organs have applied “mass mobilization” tactics within overseas Chinese communities in countries such as Spain and Italy. In addition, a People’s Court Daily article confirmed that this approach reflects broader CCP policy and is not confined to Europe.

Within the CCP’s political and legal system, responsibilities are divided: the Ministry of Public Security handles domestic matters, while the Ministry of State Security deals with foreign operations. However, the Ministry of Public Security has carried out all the aforementioned types of transnational repression. Why?

The answer traces back to the CCP’s persecution of Falun Gong. From the earliest stages of that campaign, the regime faced a new challenge: Falun Gong had already gained a wide following overseas.

According to a Freedom House report, one of the CCP’s earliest overseas efforts involved launching targeted operations against U.S.-based New Tang Dynasty Television, a media outlet founded by Falun Gong practitioners.
New York-based Shen Yun Performing Arts also became a target of the CCP’s transnational repression campaign.

‘Unrestricted Warfare’

According to internal CCP documents disclosed by the Association for the Protection of Human Rights and Religious Freedom, in December 2015, then-chief of the CCP Central Political and Legal Affairs Commission, Meng Jianzhu, stated at a national meeting of 610 Office directors: “The struggle against Falun Gong is, in fact, a serious political struggle—an ideological contest with anti-China forces in the West.”

In CCP parlance, “anti-China forces in the West” is often a coded reference to the U.S. government.

Just as the CCP’s transnational repression apparatus used against Falun Gong can be turned against other groups, the tactics developed to target the practice can also be repurposed to suppress any American organization or individual perceived as a threat.

American policymakers are increasingly aware of this. In addition to the new Texas state law, both the previous and current sessions of Congress have introduced similar legislation. The Countering Transnational Repression Act has yet to be enacted as a law and needs public support.

In an interview with The Epoch Times in late May, Rep. Scott Perry (R-Pa.) described the CCP’s campaign against Shen Yun Performing Arts as a form of “unrestricted warfare.”

“They [The CCP] fight on every single inch of the battlefield,” Perry said.

Indeed, for years, the CCP has viewed the persecution of Falun Gong in the United States as part of its broader struggle against the United States—and now, perhaps America is finally beginning to recognize this reality.

Views expressed in this article are opinions of the author and do not necessarily reflect the views of The Epoch Times.
.