UK Solar Push Sparks Concerns Over China Reliance and Labour Practices

.
Critics question whether the UK can afford to prioritise cheap solar imports without sacrificing its values or energy sovereignty.
As the UK accelerates its solar rollout in the race to net zero, questions are growing over the implications of its reliance on China, the world’s largest solar panel producer.
The British government has made solar energy a key part of its plan to reach net zero by 2050.
The government said the scheme could save public services up to £400 million over 30 years, by cutting energy bills and potentially selling surplus electricity back to the grid.
Solar Production
With no significant UK-based solar manufacturing, the equipment will likely be imported—most of it from China, which has been criticised for the use of forced labour and reliance on coal for production.Solar panels, or photovoltaic (PV) systems, convert sunlight into electricity.
They are typically installed on rooftops or across fields in large-scale solar farms. While they produce no emissions during use, manufacturing them is energy-intensive and heavily reliant on fossil fuels.
This is mainly because most manufacturing takes place in China, particularly in the provinces of Xinjiang and Jiangsu, where coal dominates local energy supply.

Energy Security and Net Zero Secretary Ed Miliband during a visit to the Siemens Energy turbine factory to launch the clean power 2030 action plan in Hull, England, on Dec. 13, 2024. Danny Lawson/PA Wire
.
The China Connection
In Rutland, Kearns has led a campaign against the Mallard Pass Solar Project, a proposed 2,175-acre solar farm on the Lincolnshire–Rutland border. The project was backed by Canadian Solar, a global renewable energy company that conducts its manufacturing operations in China.Domestic Solar
At present, the UK has little choice but to rely on imports. Building a domestic solar manufacturing industry would require significant government intervention.Analysis suggests that China’s capacity to produce and supply solar modules will be sufficient to meet all annual global demand by 2032.
According to the IEA, producing a panel in the United States costs three times more than in China, while Indian-made panels are about twice as expensive.
The IEA urged governments to weigh the benefits of local manufacturing—including jobs and energy security—against the higher expense.
.

Engineers from Associated Clean Technologies work to attach solar panels to the roof of York Minster in England on Oct. 31, 2024. Ian Forsyth/Getty Images
.
Energy Benefits or Energy Illusions?
Solar panels are often labelled “clean,” with National Grid suggesting that the carbon payback period for solar panels is on average one to four years, while the panels last for over 25 years.“This means that over a solar panel’s lifetime - typically 30 years - it will generate zero-carbon and zero-pollution electricity for decades after any carbon emitted during its production has been paid back,” the National Grid said.
The report also warned of supply-demand imbalances, with global manufacturing capacity exceeding demand by 100 percent in some segments, leading to price crashes, market instability, and huge financial losses among manufacturers.
Without sufficient battery storage or grid upgrades, excess electricity often goes unused, which is a problem known as curtailment.
The IEA has reported that curtailment levels are reaching 10 percent in several countries, and the UK is likely to face the same issues without rapid investment in infrastructure.
.