UK Parliament Backs Amendment Targeting Forced Organ Harvesting

New UK legislation that aims to stop British people from participating in forced organ harvesting in China has passed unopposed in Parliament. The amendment to the UK’s new Health and Care Bill—if becomes law—will criminalise any British resident who pays for the supply of an organ, seeks to find someone willing to supply an organ for payment, or initiates or negotiates any such commercial arrangement outside of the UK, health minister Edward Argar said. The proposed legislation applies to residents in Britain and UK nationals that are not residents of Northern Ireland. The amendment states that UK nationals include British citizens, British overseas territories citizens, British Nationals (Overseas) or British Overseas citizens, British subjects under the British Nationality Act 1981, or British protected persons within the meaning of that Act. Moving the amendment in the House of Commons, Argar said that the measure, coupled with the Conservative government’s “commitment to work with NHS Blood and Transplant to make more patients aware of the legal, health, and ethical ramifications of purchasing an organ,” would “send an unambiguous signal that complicity in the abuses associated with the overseas organ trade will not be tolerated.” Commercial dealings in organs for transplantation have already been illegal within the UK. Shadow Health Secretary Wes Streeting told MPs the Labour Party welcomes the change in the bill. “It amends the Human Tissue Act to prohibit UK citizens from traveling to countries such as China—although the wording of the amendment is not country-specific—for the purpose of organ transplantation,” he said. “In some parts of the world, organs are not given freely but are taken by force. And we must bear this in mind in the drafting of our legislation.” Lord Hunt of Kings Heath speaks to The Epoch Times in a virtual interview, in the UK on Mar. 2, 2021 (The Epoch Times/Screenshot) The government amendment (pdf) was proposed in lieu of a House of Lords version introduced by Philip Hunt, Lord Hunt of Kings Heath. Moving his version of the amendment on March 16, Hunt told the House of Lords that his amendment would prohibit UK citizens from travelling to countries such as China for the purpose of organ transplantation. “Forced organ harvesting in China is the crime of forcibly extracting organs from prisoners of conscience, killing the victim in the process. The harvested organs are sold to Chinese officials, Chinese nationals, or foreigners for transplantation,” the Labour peer said. Stemming from his desire to encourage an increase in organ donations in the UK, Hunt has long campaigned to end forced organ harvesting in China. Hunt’s amendment, which enjoyed cross-party support in the House of Lords, would also criminalise receiving organs abroad without “the free, informed, and specific consent” from a living donor or the donor’s next of kin, where the donor is unable to provide consent. It would also have required the health secretary to publish annual assessments of countries that don’t require explicit consent for the legal donation of controlled material such as human organs. The proposed assessment report would determine whether each of those countries provides a formal, publicly funded scheme for opting out of deemed consent for donation of controlled materials and effective public education on the system. The countries would also be assessed on whether they are committing genocide by resolution of the House of Commons. Argar said the government has “significant concerns about the adverse impact this approach—as in that amendment—could have on transport patients and NHS staff.” The health minister previously told the House of Lords that he believes by putting the burden on transplant recipients to ensure proper consent is given, Hunt’s amendment would deter individuals who “legitimately receive organs overseas,” from “seeking follow-up treatment for fear of being treated like a criminal suspect.” He also argued the Hunt amendment would place “considerable burdens “on the NHS by mandating an annual report. Argar said he believes his amendment would “achieve a similar effect” to Hunt’s version, “but without creating disproportionate impact on vulnerable recipients and NHS staff.“ The Health and Care Bill is currently in the final stage before becoming law—known as the “ping pong” when the bill goes back and forth between the two Houses of Parliament, each of which considers amendments from the other house. The tribunal panel (L–R) of U.S. history professor Arthur Waldron, Malaysian lawyer Andrew Khoo, professor of cardiothoracic surgery Martin Elliott, tribunal chair Sir Geoffrey Nice QC, businessman Nicholas Vetch, Iranian human rights lawyer Shadi Sadr, and U.S. lawyer Regina Paulose, in London, on Dec. 8, 2018. (Justin Palmer) On June 17, 2019, the China Tribunal—an independent people’s tribunal—unanimously concluded that prisoners of conscience have been—

UK Parliament Backs Amendment Targeting Forced Organ Harvesting

New UK legislation that aims to stop British people from participating in forced organ harvesting in China has passed unopposed in Parliament.

The amendment to the UK’s new Health and Care Bill—if becomes law—will criminalise any British resident who pays for the supply of an organ, seeks to find someone willing to supply an organ for payment, or initiates or negotiates any such commercial arrangement outside of the UK, health minister Edward Argar said.

The proposed legislation applies to residents in Britain and UK nationals that are not residents of Northern Ireland.

The amendment states that UK nationals include British citizens, British overseas territories citizens, British Nationals (Overseas) or British Overseas citizens, British subjects under the British Nationality Act 1981, or British protected persons within the meaning of that Act.

Moving the amendment in the House of Commons, Argar said that the measure, coupled with the Conservative government’s “commitment to work with NHS Blood and Transplant to make more patients aware of the legal, health, and ethical ramifications of purchasing an organ,” would “send an unambiguous signal that complicity in the abuses associated with the overseas organ trade will not be tolerated.”

Commercial dealings in organs for transplantation have already been illegal within the UK.

Shadow Health Secretary Wes Streeting told MPs the Labour Party welcomes the change in the bill.

“It amends the Human Tissue Act to prohibit UK citizens from traveling to countries such as China—although the wording of the amendment is not country-specific—for the purpose of organ transplantation,” he said.

“In some parts of the world, organs are not given freely but are taken by force. And we must bear this in mind in the drafting of our legislation.”

Lord Hunt of Kings Heath
Lord Hunt of Kings Heath speaks to The Epoch Times in a virtual interview, in the UK on Mar. 2, 2021 (The Epoch Times/Screenshot)

The government amendment (pdf) was proposed in lieu of a House of Lords version introduced by Philip Hunt, Lord Hunt of Kings Heath.

Moving his version of the amendment on March 16, Hunt told the House of Lords that his amendment would prohibit UK citizens from travelling to countries such as China for the purpose of organ transplantation.

“Forced organ harvesting in China is the crime of forcibly extracting organs from prisoners of conscience, killing the victim in the process. The harvested organs are sold to Chinese officials, Chinese nationals, or foreigners for transplantation,” the Labour peer said.

Stemming from his desire to encourage an increase in organ donations in the UK, Hunt has long campaigned to end forced organ harvesting in China.

Hunt’s amendment, which enjoyed cross-party support in the House of Lords, would also criminalise receiving organs abroad without “the free, informed, and specific consent” from a living donor or the donor’s next of kin, where the donor is unable to provide consent.

It would also have required the health secretary to publish annual assessments of countries that don’t require explicit consent for the legal donation of controlled material such as human organs.

The proposed assessment report would determine whether each of those countries provides a formal, publicly funded scheme for opting out of deemed consent for donation of controlled materials and effective public education on the system.

The countries would also be assessed on whether they are committing genocide by resolution of the House of Commons.

Argar said the government has “significant concerns about the adverse impact this approach—as in that amendment—could have on transport patients and NHS staff.”

The health minister previously told the House of Lords that he believes by putting the burden on transplant recipients to ensure proper consent is given, Hunt’s amendment would deter individuals who “legitimately receive organs overseas,” from “seeking follow-up treatment for fear of being treated like a criminal suspect.”

He also argued the Hunt amendment would place “considerable burdens “on the NHS by mandating an annual report.

Argar said he believes his amendment would “achieve a similar effect” to Hunt’s version, “but without creating disproportionate impact on vulnerable recipients and NHS staff.“

The Health and Care Bill is currently in the final stage before becoming law—known as the “ping pong” when the bill goes back and forth between the two Houses of Parliament, each of which considers amendments from the other house.

The tribunal panel
The tribunal panel (L–R) of U.S. history professor Arthur Waldron, Malaysian lawyer Andrew Khoo, professor of cardiothoracic surgery Martin Elliott, tribunal chair Sir Geoffrey Nice QC, businessman Nicholas Vetch, Iranian human rights lawyer Shadi Sadr, and U.S. lawyer Regina Paulose, in London, on Dec. 8, 2018. (Justin Palmer)

On June 17, 2019, the China Tribunal—an independent people’s tribunal—unanimously concluded that prisoners of conscience have been—and continue to be—killed in China for their organs “on a significant scale,” and that adherents of the spiritual practice Falun Gong have been one of the main sources of organ supply.

The tribunal on March 1, 2020, published a 160-page report, reaffirming its previous conclusion, saying there was “no evidence of the practice having been stopped and the Tribunal is satisfied that it is continuing.”

Ethan Gutmann, a China studies fellow at the Washington-based nonprofit Victims of Communism Memorial Foundation (VOC) and co-founder of the International Coalition to End Transplant Abuse in China, said in a webinar on Feb. 24, 2021, that his investigation suggests that forced organ harvesting from the Uyghurs was also happening at a substantial scale.


Follow

Lily Zhou is a freelance writer mostly covering UK news for The Epoch Times.