Let’s End Magical Thinking on Energy

Fossil fuels matter to our national security interests and those of our allies. Commentary Six years ago, I asked energy companies and others to fund research on why, in addition to being valuable economic commodities, oil and natural gas might be integral to Canada’s and our allies’ security interests. The theory was that Canadians who normally think only superficially about fossil fuels might be more sympathetic to their development if they grasped how dangerous it was for our allies to rely as heavily as they do on imports of natural gas and oil from autocracies and tyrannies. There was little interest. Energy CEOs seemed convinced that opposition to Canadian oil and gas could be overcome with numbers arguments alone, i.e., by emphasizing how profitable the sector is for Canada in terms of jobs, incomes and tax revenues. That was a mistake. Too many Canadians then as now believed in either-or choices on oil and gas: Either keep pumping “dirty” energy or give that up and move forward into a bright green future. That was always simplistic, but it made consideration of the economic benefits of fossil fuels seem crude in comparison to the romantic visions of a pure, pre-industrial world offered up by deep greens. Now, tragically, energy security is a 100-point headline, given Russia’s invasion of Ukraine and the folly of Europe’s dependence on Russia for too much of its energy use — dependence that increased steadily over the past two decades as Europeans shut down nuclear and coal electrical generation plants and discouraged new oil and gas exploration on their continent. The result of such policy follies is that Russian president — president for life — Vladimir Putin has dangerously increased his leverage over Europe, which is highly dependent on foreign natural gas and oil, much of it coming from tyrannies and autocracies. For example, between 2005 and 2019, the EU imported over €838 billion in natural gas from foreign sources, or an average of nearly €56 billion per year. About one-third of that came from tyrannies and autocracies (mainly Russia, Algeria and Libya) — “not-free” countries in the terminology of Washington-based think tank, Freedom House — with the rest from “free” countries (liberal democracies) and “partly free” countries. By 2019, however, the proportion of Europe’s imported natural gas from not-free countries had risen to 41 per cent — although that is likely an underestimate, as Germany does not release all its data on fossil fuel imports from Russia. As for oil, the EU is even more dependent on autocracies and tyrannies for imports. Between 2005 and 2019, it imported €4.6 trillion in foreign oil, with 68 per cent or €3.1 trillion worth coming from countries not considered democratic or free. In 2019, the share was down only slightly, to 67 per cent. (These data are from the Canadian Energy Centre, where I co-authored several reports on the oil and natural gas exports of regressive regimes worldwide.) Russia accounts for 58 per cent of the natural gas and 42 per cent of the oil that the EU bought from tyrannies and autocracies between 2005 and 2019. It is time for Canadians to end their magical thinking about energy. That includes dropping the fantasy that we can realistically reduce carbon emissions to net-zero by 2050. As University of Manitoba professor emeritus Vaclav Smil has long argued (he being the leading world expert in energy transitions) the physical capacities of oil, natural gas and coal cannot be replaced by the low-punch energy density of renewables. Responsible analysts, politicians, insurers and investors need to recognize that fossil fuels will continue to be crucial to our energy needs and now also to our national security interests and those of our allies, be they in Europe, the United States or Asia. There is little reason why Germany or Japan, for example, should continue to rely so heavily on natural gas from not-free countries when liquified natural gas could be extracted from Alberta and Northern British Columbia but also from Atlantic Canada and Quebec, as all have the potential for significant extraction and exports. Yes, this would require a sea change in attitude among Canadian politicians, but it would be a mature recognition of the actual world we live in, strategic interests included. In the last century, Canadian families sent their sons to fight and to die in multiple wars to defend Europe and Asia from tyrannies. The least that responsible modern-day Canadians can do is tighten our links with allies. That includes looking at energy as part of a worldwide security pact with other democracies and making it as easy as possible for Canadian energy to get to them. This article was originally published in Financial Post.  Views expressed in this article are the opinions of the author and do not necessarily reflect the views of The Epoch Times. Follow Mark Milke is president of The Aristotle Foundat

Let’s End Magical Thinking on Energy

Fossil fuels matter to our national security interests and those of our allies.

Commentary

Six years ago, I asked energy companies and others to fund research on why, in addition to being valuable economic commodities, oil and natural gas might be integral to Canada’s and our allies’ security interests. The theory was that Canadians who normally think only superficially about fossil fuels might be more sympathetic to their development if they grasped how dangerous it was for our allies to rely as heavily as they do on imports of natural gas and oil from autocracies and tyrannies.

There was little interest. Energy CEOs seemed convinced that opposition to Canadian oil and gas could be overcome with numbers arguments alone, i.e., by emphasizing how profitable the sector is for Canada in terms of jobs, incomes and tax revenues.

That was a mistake. Too many Canadians then as now believed in either-or choices on oil and gas: Either keep pumping “dirty” energy or give that up and move forward into a bright green future. That was always simplistic, but it made consideration of the economic benefits of fossil fuels seem crude in comparison to the romantic visions of a pure, pre-industrial world offered up by deep greens.

Now, tragically, energy security is a 100-point headline, given Russia’s invasion of Ukraine and the folly of Europe’s dependence on Russia for too much of its energy use — dependence that increased steadily over the past two decades as Europeans shut down nuclear and coal electrical generation plants and discouraged new oil and gas exploration on their continent.

The result of such policy follies is that Russian president — president for life — Vladimir Putin has dangerously increased his leverage over Europe, which is highly dependent on foreign natural gas and oil, much of it coming from tyrannies and autocracies.

For example, between 2005 and 2019, the EU imported over €838 billion in natural gas from foreign sources, or an average of nearly €56 billion per year. About one-third of that came from tyrannies and autocracies (mainly Russia, Algeria and Libya) — “not-free” countries in the terminology of Washington-based think tank, Freedom House — with the rest from “free” countries (liberal democracies) and “partly free” countries. By 2019, however, the proportion of Europe’s imported natural gas from not-free countries had risen to 41 per cent — although that is likely an underestimate, as Germany does not release all its data on fossil fuel imports from Russia.

As for oil, the EU is even more dependent on autocracies and tyrannies for imports. Between 2005 and 2019, it imported €4.6 trillion in foreign oil, with 68 per cent or €3.1 trillion worth coming from countries not considered democratic or free. In 2019, the share was down only slightly, to 67 per cent. (These data are from the Canadian Energy Centre, where I co-authored several reports on the oil and natural gas exports of regressive regimes worldwide.) Russia accounts for 58 per cent of the natural gas and 42 per cent of the oil that the EU bought from tyrannies and autocracies between 2005 and 2019.

It is time for Canadians to end their magical thinking about energy. That includes dropping the fantasy that we can realistically reduce carbon emissions to net-zero by 2050. As University of Manitoba professor emeritus Vaclav Smil has long argued (he being the leading world expert in energy transitions) the physical capacities of oil, natural gas and coal cannot be replaced by the low-punch energy density of renewables. Responsible analysts, politicians, insurers and investors need to recognize that fossil fuels will continue to be crucial to our energy needs and now also to our national security interests and those of our allies, be they in Europe, the United States or Asia.

There is little reason why Germany or Japan, for example, should continue to rely so heavily on natural gas from not-free countries when liquified natural gas could be extracted from Alberta and Northern British Columbia but also from Atlantic Canada and Quebec, as all have the potential for significant extraction and exports.

Yes, this would require a sea change in attitude among Canadian politicians, but it would be a mature recognition of the actual world we live in, strategic interests included.

In the last century, Canadian families sent their sons to fight and to die in multiple wars to defend Europe and Asia from tyrannies. The least that responsible modern-day Canadians can do is tighten our links with allies. That includes looking at energy as part of a worldwide security pact with other democracies and making it as easy as possible for Canadian energy to get to them.

This article was originally published in Financial Post. 

Views expressed in this article are the opinions of the author and do not necessarily reflect the views of The Epoch Times.


Follow

Mark Milke is president of The Aristotle Foundation for Public Policy, a new think-tank set for launch later this year. His most recent book is The Victim Cult: How the culture of blame hurts everyone and wrecks civilizations.