Groupthink and Identity Tribalism Damage Our Constitutional Republic

CommentaryAt the 1787 Constitutional Convention, Elizabeth Powel of Philadelphia asked Benjamin Franklin whether the newly declared nation of the United States was a republic or a monarchy. Dr. Franklin replied: “A republic, if you can keep it.” At the time, the central thesis of America’s public policy discourse was preoccupied with devising the world’s first modern human experiment of self-government. However, the somber advice of safeguarding the experiment and our founding values of a constitutional republic is still relevant today. The longevity and health of a liberal democracy and a genuinely classical liberal society rest upon rational collective actions of informed and educated citizens whose individual pursuits of freedom, enlightenment, happiness, and private property largely align with the greater public good. In turn, an educated and well-informed citizenry is the most potent weapon against political factions, hyper-partisanship, and the tyranny of the majority. Such a solid premise requires a general acceptance of America’s institutional design, open inquiry, robust public discourse, civil dissent, and more importantly, a consensus on the importance of critical thinking. Without these basic ingredients, necessary self-repair and revisions to democratic governance can’t take hold. By and large, Americans have always strived to come together in spite of our vast differences in backgrounds, creed, and opinions. Generation after generation, free-thinking and freedom-loving Americans have managed to sufficiently contain the primal impulses of racial and political tribalism in a shared journey seeking a more perfect union. But lately, these illiberal impulses are increasingly rigging the system. With the aid of national political polarity, sensational media reporting and a bumbling bureaucracy in education, government and other important sectors, we are now quick to embrace groupthink, contempt before investigation, and harsh judgement of fellow Americans. The “2021 College Free Speech Rankings” by Foundation for Individual Rights and Expression, College Pulse and Real Clear Education found that over 80 percent of students engage in self-censorship at least some of the time, and 66 percent deem it acceptable to shout down a speaker. Educational leaders in Coronado, a sleepy seaside town in San Diego, rushed to label an unexpected tortilla-throwing incident at a high school basketball championship game as “racist, classist and colorist.” A thorough investigation revealed the instigator of the “tortilla-gate” to be a self-described “democratic socialist.” One after another, student groups in California, Missouri, and Michigan produced mind-blowing racial incidents, such as Ku Klux Klan graffiti in the school bathroom, racial slurs, and defacing of a Black doll. Tesla is being sued by the government for perpetuating racism in employee relations and business operations. In all cases, manufactured racial animus have led to demands for anti-racist programs to “heal trauma” and “dismantle white supremacy.” I recently discovered that I was doxxed as the “Asian dog waste lady” in my new neighborhood by someone who had called police on an unsubstantiated claim of my dog’s alleged unsanitary activity on the community sidewalk. A social media post featuring a low-quality video of my walking my pooch, along with my family’s personal details, has become one of the most commented stories in my neighborhood’s online group. Many commented to condemn me and some were eager to dissociate with me because they are not the “Asian dog poop lady who lives in that grey house on the cul-de-sac.” The herd mentality, identifying me on the basis of my race and judging my action (or inaction) based on inconspicuous evidence, is astounding. Have we simply lost our ways? I can care less about unfounded “neighborly” gossip—truth always prevails. After all, I always pick up after my furry companion and shouldn’t have had to justify myself to law enforcement. While paw patrol was imposed on me rather amusingly, I sent flowers to the neighbor who doxxed me. But my quagmire is just a snapshot of the larger society in which human decency and critical thinking are being weakened by the tempting pull of racial divisions, cancel culture, and group think. If we continue on this path, a republic we will keep no more. Views expressed in this article are the opinions of the author and do not necessarily reflect the views of The Epoch Times. Follow Wenyuan Wu holds a doctorate in international studies from the University of Miami and is the executive director of Californians for Equal Rights Foundation. Wu’s recent advocacy has focused on combatting critical race theory in American public life. She has given expert testimony in various state legislature hearings on the topic and helped launched the website RejectCRT.org. She writes for Minding the Campus of the National Association of Scholars and sit

Groupthink and Identity Tribalism Damage Our Constitutional Republic

Commentary

At the 1787 Constitutional Convention, Elizabeth Powel of Philadelphia asked Benjamin Franklin whether the newly declared nation of the United States was a republic or a monarchy. Dr. Franklin replied: “A republic, if you can keep it.” At the time, the central thesis of America’s public policy discourse was preoccupied with devising the world’s first modern human experiment of self-government.

However, the somber advice of safeguarding the experiment and our founding values of a constitutional republic is still relevant today. The longevity and health of a liberal democracy and a genuinely classical liberal society rest upon rational collective actions of informed and educated citizens whose individual pursuits of freedom, enlightenment, happiness, and private property largely align with the greater public good. In turn, an educated and well-informed citizenry is the most potent weapon against political factions, hyper-partisanship, and the tyranny of the majority.

Such a solid premise requires a general acceptance of America’s institutional design, open inquiry, robust public discourse, civil dissent, and more importantly, a consensus on the importance of critical thinking. Without these basic ingredients, necessary self-repair and revisions to democratic governance can’t take hold.

By and large, Americans have always strived to come together in spite of our vast differences in backgrounds, creed, and opinions. Generation after generation, free-thinking and freedom-loving Americans have managed to sufficiently contain the primal impulses of racial and political tribalism in a shared journey seeking a more perfect union.

But lately, these illiberal impulses are increasingly rigging the system. With the aid of national political polarity, sensational media reporting and a bumbling bureaucracy in education, government and other important sectors, we are now quick to embrace groupthink, contempt before investigation, and harsh judgement of fellow Americans.

The “2021 College Free Speech Rankings” by Foundation for Individual Rights and Expression, College Pulse and Real Clear Education found that over 80 percent of students engage in self-censorship at least some of the time, and 66 percent deem it acceptable to shout down a speaker.

Educational leaders in Coronado, a sleepy seaside town in San Diego, rushed to label an unexpected tortilla-throwing incident at a high school basketball championship game as “racist, classist and colorist.” A thorough investigation revealed the instigator of the “tortilla-gate” to be a self-described “democratic socialist.”

One after another, student groups in California, Missouri, and Michigan produced mind-blowing racial incidents, such as Ku Klux Klan graffiti in the school bathroom, racial slurs, and defacing of a Black doll. Tesla is being sued by the government for perpetuating racism in employee relations and business operations. In all cases, manufactured racial animus have led to demands for anti-racist programs to “heal trauma” and “dismantle white supremacy.”

I recently discovered that I was doxxed as the “Asian dog waste lady” in my new neighborhood by someone who had called police on an unsubstantiated claim of my dog’s alleged unsanitary activity on the community sidewalk.

A social media post featuring a low-quality video of my walking my pooch, along with my family’s personal details, has become one of the most commented stories in my neighborhood’s online group. Many commented to condemn me and some were eager to dissociate with me because they are not the “Asian dog poop lady who lives in that grey house on the cul-de-sac.” The herd mentality, identifying me on the basis of my race and judging my action (or inaction) based on inconspicuous evidence, is astounding.

Have we simply lost our ways? I can care less about unfounded “neighborly” gossip—truth always prevails. After all, I always pick up after my furry companion and shouldn’t have had to justify myself to law enforcement. While paw patrol was imposed on me rather amusingly, I sent flowers to the neighbor who doxxed me.

But my quagmire is just a snapshot of the larger society in which human decency and critical thinking are being weakened by the tempting pull of racial divisions, cancel culture, and group think.

If we continue on this path, a republic we will keep no more.

Views expressed in this article are the opinions of the author and do not necessarily reflect the views of The Epoch Times.


Follow

Wenyuan Wu holds a doctorate in international studies from the University of Miami and is the executive director of Californians for Equal Rights Foundation. Wu’s recent advocacy has focused on combatting critical race theory in American public life. She has given expert testimony in various state legislature hearings on the topic and helped launched the website RejectCRT.org. She writes for Minding the Campus of the National Association of Scholars and sits on the board of Parents Defending Education Action.