Grassroots Protests Happen Every Day Inside China: Freedom House
In China, protests are happening every day, “in the streets, in their communities, on banners, on walls, in cyberspace, collectively, and individually,” despite years of censorship and social maintenance by the regime, reported the U.S.-based human rights organization, Freedom House.On Nov. 14, Freedom House released its latest report (pdf) from its database China Dissent Monitor (CDM). The CDM documented a total of 668 dissent events recorded nationwide for June–September 2022. Evidence of repression was observed in one-quarter of all dissent events in the CDM database. Violence was the most frequent form of reprisal by both state and non-state agents. Many Forms of Dissent CDM data demonstrated the diversity of the Chinese demonstrations. It is clear that mainlanders seek a variety of methods to challenge those in power—both state and non-state—for their own rights and interests, from small acts of individual resistance to various modes of collective action, both online and offline. A minimum of 8,775 people participated in those four months in the 636 offline dissent events listed in the CDM data. Among all documented cases, 214 (32 percent) involved delayed housing projects, 110 (17 percent) involved pay and benefits, and 106 (16 percent) involved fraud. While stalled housing projects and labor grievances motivated half of the 668 total events, the data included a range of other issues that drive dissent in China, such as fraud, land rights, zero-COVID, and state violence. Judging from the survey, the Freedom House tweeted, “Since June, people have protested in nearly every province and directly administered city.” Protesters march on a road during a pro-democracy rally against a proposed new security law in Hong Kong on May 24, 2020. The proposed legislation is expected to ban treason, subversion and sedition, and follows repeated warnings from Beijing that it will no longer tolerate dissent in Hong Kong, which was shaken by months of massive protests last year. (Anthony Wallace/AFP via Getty Images) Many Forms of Repression The CDM data suggests that repression is common. Faith groups, in particular, currently only constitute 2 percent of all dissent events recorded in the CDM database, but they suffer 6 percent of repression. “This in part reflects the severity of controls over the activities of faith groups,” said the report. The types of repression documented include torture, execution, fines, movement limitation, interrogation, expulsion, monitoring, arrest, detention, obstruction, among others. In his article about the repression, Kevin Slaten, CDM project lead, said that repression is common not because the actions threaten the regime directly, but because the Party “treats the act of collectively, publicly challenging any authority as a potential threat—whether village officials or a powerful company engaged in fraud—particularly when the protesters can win concessions.” He wrote, “This is why ‘social stability’ is ingrained in all levels of governance and ability to enforce it is among the top metrics considered for party cadre promotion.” Slaten stressed that the regime’s goal is to “reduce the ability of citizens to mobilize.” The report states that most statistics outlined in the report are “likely a drastic underrepresentation of dissent,” due to media restrictions under the dictatorship and risks associated with collecting information from within the country about dissent and protest. The CDM project is a new Freedom House initiative prioritizing capturing offline collective action in public spaces, with sources from news reports, civil society organizations, and the Beijing-based social media platforms. Follow Mary Hong has contributed to The Epoch Times since 2020. She has reported on Chinese human rights issues and politics.
Udumbara
In China, protests are happening every day, “in the streets, in their communities, on banners, on walls, in cyberspace, collectively, and individually,” despite years of censorship and social maintenance by the regime, reported the U.S.-based human rights organization, Freedom House.
On Nov. 14, Freedom House released its latest report (pdf) from its database China Dissent Monitor (CDM).
The CDM documented a total of 668 dissent events recorded nationwide for June–September 2022.
Evidence of repression was observed in one-quarter of all dissent events in the CDM database. Violence was the most frequent form of reprisal by both state and non-state agents.
Many Forms of Dissent
CDM data demonstrated the diversity of the Chinese demonstrations.
It is clear that mainlanders seek a variety of methods to challenge those in power—both state and non-state—for their own rights and interests, from small acts of individual resistance to various modes of collective action, both online and offline.
A minimum of 8,775 people participated in those four months in the 636 offline dissent events listed in the CDM data.
Among all documented cases, 214 (32 percent) involved delayed housing projects, 110 (17 percent) involved pay and benefits, and 106 (16 percent) involved fraud.
While stalled housing projects and labor grievances motivated half of the 668 total events, the data included a range of other issues that drive dissent in China, such as fraud, land rights, zero-COVID, and state violence.
Judging from the survey, the Freedom House tweeted, “Since June, people have protested in nearly every province and directly administered city.”
Many Forms of Repression
The CDM data suggests that repression is common.
Faith groups, in particular, currently only constitute 2 percent of all dissent events recorded in the CDM database, but they suffer 6 percent of repression.
“This in part reflects the severity of controls over the activities of faith groups,” said the report.
The types of repression documented include torture, execution, fines, movement limitation, interrogation, expulsion, monitoring, arrest, detention, obstruction, among others.
In his article about the repression, Kevin Slaten, CDM project lead, said that repression is common not because the actions threaten the regime directly, but because the Party “treats the act of collectively, publicly challenging any authority as a potential threat—whether village officials or a powerful company engaged in fraud—particularly when the protesters can win concessions.”
He wrote, “This is why ‘social stability’ is ingrained in all levels of governance and ability to enforce it is among the top metrics considered for party cadre promotion.”
Slaten stressed that the regime’s goal is to “reduce the ability of citizens to mobilize.”
The report states that most statistics outlined in the report are “likely a drastic underrepresentation of dissent,” due to media restrictions under the dictatorship and risks associated with collecting information from within the country about dissent and protest.
The CDM project is a new Freedom House initiative prioritizing capturing offline collective action in public spaces, with sources from news reports, civil society organizations, and the Beijing-based social media platforms.
