CCP Threatens Quad With Nukes

CommentaryWhile China and Russia coordinate nuclear-capable bomber flights against the United States and its Quad allies—Japan, Australia, and India—the Quad is tied in knots, talking about fishing patrols, making unilateral concessions on Taiwan, and turning a blind eye to Russia’s invasion of Ukraine. On May 24, the same day that Quad heads of state, including President Joe Biden, held their meetings in Tokyo, six Chinese and Russian bombers flew over the Sea of Japan and environs. The flights directly threatened the other Quad heads of state, including Fumio Kishida of Japan, Anthony Albanese of Australia, and Narendra Modi of India. Japan’s Air Self-Defense Force scrambled fighter jets in response to the bombers, warning them off of the country’s airspace. Beijing aims to threaten, degrade, and test Japan and Taiwan’s air forces. The number of belligerent flights has increased in tandem with China’s economic growth and military spending. In February, China’s People’s Liberation Army (PLA) navy went further, sailing into Australia’s exclusive economic zone (EEZ) and firing a military-grade laser at an Australian air force plane conducting legitimate surveillance close to home. In the context of such belligerence, the Biden administration is doing too little and sometimes even backsliding into unilateral concessions. On May 22, national security adviser Jake Sullivan made such a concession to Beijing, perhaps to “improve” the chances of securing a summit between Biden and Chinese leader Xi Jinping. Sullivan announced that Taiwan would not be joining Biden’s new Indo-Pacific trade pact, the Indo-Pacific Economic Framework (IPEF). (L–R) Australian Prime Minister Anthony Albanese, U.S. President Joe Biden, Japanese Prime Minister Fumio Kishida, and Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi pose for photos at the entrance hall of the Prime Minister’s Office of Japan in Tokyo on May 24, 2022. (Zhang Xiaoyu/Pool via Reuters) Predictably, throwing Taiwan under the bus had the opposite of the intended effect. Instead of announcing a summit, Xi got Russian President Vladimir Putin to join in bomber flights near both Japan and Taiwan. Beijing wants countries in the Asia-Pacific—including India, Australia, Japan, and Taiwan—to feel so greedy for a part of China’s economic growth, and threatened by its nuclear-capable hypersonic missiles and long-range bombers that they cede leadership of all of Asia, piece-by-piece, to Beijing. There aren’t many takers at the moment, though a few countries—like Laos, Cambodia, and most recently, the Solomon Islands—are succumbing to what likely includes Beijing’s widespread tactic of bribery of heads of state. This is according to court convictions, reporting, and my sources, who are in a position to know. Beijing has presented the allegedly corruption-induced agreement with the Solomons as a model for other Asia-Pacific islands, including Kiribati and possibly Tonga and Vanuatu. The agreements would cover economic, military, and cyber cooperation, putting these countries squarely into Beijing’s sphere of influence, including naval basing rights and opening of their telecommunications systems to electronic spying by the Chinese Communist Party (CCP). Beijing is threatened by the Quad because the United States and its allies offer a better alternative, and without corruption. In two words, freedom and sovereignty. The CCP’s response to this choice for integrity is to try and scare countries with the threat of nuclear war, as they did this week. In their small way, the Quad and allies are at least not showing much fear and inching forward in defense of the region. At the meeting, the Quad announced it will start satellite tracking of illegal fishing in Asia, most of which emanates from Chinese ships that have turned off their transponders. What’s really needed, though, is not just tracking but all NATO and Quad-plus (those present at the Tokyo meeting by video also included South Korea, New Zealand, and Vietnam) coast guards on joint patrols in an arc of freedom from the Bay of Bengal off of India, through the South China Sea and the Philippine Sea, all the way to the Sea of Japan and beyond. China has the world’s largest fleet of illegal fishing vessels, which ply the EEZs of countries far from Asia, including around Africa and South America. With the rise of China’s blue water navy, coast guard, and maritime militia, all of which are ultimately part of, and controlled by, the PLA, China’s naval forces will increasingly deploy globally for the protection of illegal fishing and hydrocarbon exploitation in direct conflict with Quad members’ attempts to enforce the world’s EEZs. The requirement of a NATO-Quad EEZ police is a regrettable but necessary acceptance of risk against Beijing. Fishing surveillance and unilateral concessions on Taiwan will not defeat Russian and Chinese bombers. The Quad will have to step up its game if it wants to hold the line. Views expressed in t

CCP Threatens Quad With Nukes

Commentary

While China and Russia coordinate nuclear-capable bomber flights against the United States and its Quad allies—Japan, Australia, and India—the Quad is tied in knots, talking about fishing patrols, making unilateral concessions on Taiwan, and turning a blind eye to Russia’s invasion of Ukraine.

On May 24, the same day that Quad heads of state, including President Joe Biden, held their meetings in Tokyo, six Chinese and Russian bombers flew over the Sea of Japan and environs. The flights directly threatened the other Quad heads of state, including Fumio Kishida of Japan, Anthony Albanese of Australia, and Narendra Modi of India.

Japan’s Air Self-Defense Force scrambled fighter jets in response to the bombers, warning them off of the country’s airspace.

Beijing aims to threaten, degrade, and test Japan and Taiwan’s air forces. The number of belligerent flights has increased in tandem with China’s economic growth and military spending.

In February, China’s People’s Liberation Army (PLA) navy went further, sailing into Australia’s exclusive economic zone (EEZ) and firing a military-grade laser at an Australian air force plane conducting legitimate surveillance close to home.

In the context of such belligerence, the Biden administration is doing too little and sometimes even backsliding into unilateral concessions.

On May 22, national security adviser Jake Sullivan made such a concession to Beijing, perhaps to “improve” the chances of securing a summit between Biden and Chinese leader Xi Jinping. Sullivan announced that Taiwan would not be joining Biden’s new Indo-Pacific trade pact, the Indo-Pacific Economic Framework (IPEF).

Epoch Times Photo
(L–R) Australian Prime Minister Anthony Albanese, U.S. President Joe Biden, Japanese Prime Minister Fumio Kishida, and Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi pose for photos at the entrance hall of the Prime Minister’s Office of Japan in Tokyo on May 24, 2022. (Zhang Xiaoyu/Pool via Reuters)

Predictably, throwing Taiwan under the bus had the opposite of the intended effect. Instead of announcing a summit, Xi got Russian President Vladimir Putin to join in bomber flights near both Japan and Taiwan.

Beijing wants countries in the Asia-Pacific—including India, Australia, Japan, and Taiwan—to feel so greedy for a part of China’s economic growth, and threatened by its nuclear-capable hypersonic missiles and long-range bombers that they cede leadership of all of Asia, piece-by-piece, to Beijing.

There aren’t many takers at the moment, though a few countries—like Laos, Cambodia, and most recently, the Solomon Islands—are succumbing to what likely includes Beijing’s widespread tactic of bribery of heads of state. This is according to court convictions, reporting, and my sources, who are in a position to know.

Beijing has presented the allegedly corruption-induced agreement with the Solomons as a model for other Asia-Pacific islands, including Kiribati and possibly Tonga and Vanuatu. The agreements would cover economic, military, and cyber cooperation, putting these countries squarely into Beijing’s sphere of influence, including naval basing rights and opening of their telecommunications systems to electronic spying by the Chinese Communist Party (CCP).

Beijing is threatened by the Quad because the United States and its allies offer a better alternative, and without corruption. In two words, freedom and sovereignty.

The CCP’s response to this choice for integrity is to try and scare countries with the threat of nuclear war, as they did this week. In their small way, the Quad and allies are at least not showing much fear and inching forward in defense of the region. At the meeting, the Quad announced it will start satellite tracking of illegal fishing in Asia, most of which emanates from Chinese ships that have turned off their transponders.

What’s really needed, though, is not just tracking but all NATO and Quad-plus (those present at the Tokyo meeting by video also included South Korea, New Zealand, and Vietnam) coast guards on joint patrols in an arc of freedom from the Bay of Bengal off of India, through the South China Sea and the Philippine Sea, all the way to the Sea of Japan and beyond. China has the world’s largest fleet of illegal fishing vessels, which ply the EEZs of countries far from Asia, including around Africa and South America.

With the rise of China’s blue water navy, coast guard, and maritime militia, all of which are ultimately part of, and controlled by, the PLA, China’s naval forces will increasingly deploy globally for the protection of illegal fishing and hydrocarbon exploitation in direct conflict with Quad members’ attempts to enforce the world’s EEZs. The requirement of a NATO-Quad EEZ police is a regrettable but necessary acceptance of risk against Beijing.

Fishing surveillance and unilateral concessions on Taiwan will not defeat Russian and Chinese bombers. The Quad will have to step up its game if it wants to hold the line.

Views expressed in this article are the opinions of the author and do not necessarily reflect the views of The Epoch Times.


Follow

Anders Corr has a bachelor's/master's in political science from Yale University (2001) and a doctorate in government from Harvard University (2008). He is a principal at Corr Analytics Inc., publisher of the Journal of Political Risk, and has conducted extensive research in North America, Europe, and Asia. His latest books are “The Concentration of Power: Institutionalization, Hierarchy, and Hegemony” (2021) and “Great Powers, Grand Strategies: the New Game in the South China Sea" (2018).