An Activist’s Arrest in London Shows Changing Nature of Chinese Persecution Abroad
CommentaryAustralian human rights activist Drew Pavlou was arrested in dramatic fashion outside the Chinese embassy in London late last week. A media storm is now brewing. On July 21, Drew, an outspoken critic of the Chinese Communist Party (CCP), most often in his home country of Australia, arrived outside the Chinese embassy in London. His purpose was simple: to hold a protest against the Chinese government’s campaign against Xinjiang’s Uyghur people. It was not his first protest against the CCP’s rampant human rights abuses, and likely won’t be his last. Things took a surprising turn, however, when London’s metropolitan police arrived and arrested both Drew and a British journalist–Harry Allen–who was covering the protest. Drew then spent about 23 hours incommunicado, under detention, and was interrogated without first being given access to legal counsel. Australia’s foreign service was not given early access either. It turns out that someone, likely a Chinese netizen, had become aware of the planned protest and emailed the Chinese embassy a false bomb threat from a fake email address, signing it “Drew Pavlou.” The embassy, in turn, notified the police, and so the saga began. And it is far from over. As often is the case, Chinese authorities have managed to create a worldwide media sensation over what would likely have been a minor protest, attracting little to no attention. It has also put a spotlight on what appears to be a quickly growing, and very recent, phenomenon: fake emails sent by overzealous netizens to silence critics abroad. These fakes are often laughably bad, as are the ones claiming to be from Drew. Since the initial email to the embassy, a flurry of emails has been sent to UK lawyers, politicians, and NGO workers. This morning, even though I have never met Drew and cannot claim to know him, one arrived in my inbox. The email I received spoofs an email that is supposed to belong to Drew, and at the same time, purports to be from the UK’s Crown Prosecution Service. I have filed the email with the UK police, for impersonating the UK prosecutor, and impersonating an individual. A New Tactic This is nothing new. We at Safeguard Defenders have received fake emails like this before. One claims to be from the Hong Kong national security police, threatens a co-worker of mine with arrest if she goes to Hong Kong, and warns of the possibility of being extradited there. In the UK, the hub for Chinese and Hong Kong human rights activism in Europe, lawyers, politicians, and NGO people alike have received similar emails, all within the last year. With all this going on, it is surprising that this knowledge does not seem to exist within the UK police force. If the UK police knew how common this tactic has become, it is unlikely they would have arrested a known human rights activist and a UK journalist so quickly. They would have simply stopped the protest and launched an investigation into the origins of the emails. Luckily for Drew, the more of these fake emails that arrive, the more obvious it is that he is innocent. And the more attention this drama receives, the faster police can change their investigation: from investigating Drew’s alleged bomb threat to investigating Chinese netizens who (with or without Chinese government approval) campaign to silence critics abroad, including on UK soil. There is nothing surprising about these developments. However, it is a lesson for both UK and other European police force in how to handle what is certainly going to become a more common, and in time more sophisticated, tool for suppressing human rights here in Europe itself. Views expressed in this article are the opinions of the author and do not necessarily reflect the views of The Epoch Times. Follow Peter Dahlin is the founder of the NGO Safeguard Defenders and the co-founder of the Beijing-based Chinese NGO China Action (2007–2016). He is the author of “Trial By Media,” and contributor to “The People’s Republic of the Disappeared.” He lived in Beijing from 2007, until detained and placed in a secret jail in 2016, subsequently deported and banned. Prior to living in China, he worked for the Swedish government with gender equality issues, and now lives in Madrid, Spain.
Udumbara
Commentary
Australian human rights activist Drew Pavlou was arrested in dramatic fashion outside the Chinese embassy in London late last week. A media storm is now brewing.
On July 21, Drew, an outspoken critic of the Chinese Communist Party (CCP), most often in his home country of Australia, arrived outside the Chinese embassy in London. His purpose was simple: to hold a protest against the Chinese government’s campaign against Xinjiang’s Uyghur people. It was not his first protest against the CCP’s rampant human rights abuses, and likely won’t be his last.
Things took a surprising turn, however, when London’s metropolitan police arrived and arrested both Drew and a British journalist–Harry Allen–who was covering the protest. Drew then spent about 23 hours incommunicado, under detention, and was interrogated without first being given access to legal counsel. Australia’s foreign service was not given early access either.
It turns out that someone, likely a Chinese netizen, had become aware of the planned protest and emailed the Chinese embassy a false bomb threat from a fake email address, signing it “Drew Pavlou.” The embassy, in turn, notified the police, and so the saga began. And it is far from over.
As often is the case, Chinese authorities have managed to create a worldwide media sensation over what would likely have been a minor protest, attracting little to no attention. It has also put a spotlight on what appears to be a quickly growing, and very recent, phenomenon: fake emails sent by overzealous netizens to silence critics abroad.
These fakes are often laughably bad, as are the ones claiming to be from Drew. Since the initial email to the embassy, a flurry of emails has been sent to UK lawyers, politicians, and NGO workers. This morning, even though I have never met Drew and cannot claim to know him, one arrived in my inbox.
The email I received spoofs an email that is supposed to belong to Drew, and at the same time, purports to be from the UK’s Crown Prosecution Service. I have filed the email with the UK police, for impersonating the UK prosecutor, and impersonating an individual.
A New Tactic
This is nothing new. We at Safeguard Defenders have received fake emails like this before. One claims to be from the Hong Kong national security police, threatens a co-worker of mine with arrest if she goes to Hong Kong, and warns of the possibility of being extradited there. In the UK, the hub for Chinese and Hong Kong human rights activism in Europe, lawyers, politicians, and NGO people alike have received similar emails, all within the last year.
With all this going on, it is surprising that this knowledge does not seem to exist within the UK police force. If the UK police knew how common this tactic has become, it is unlikely they would have arrested a known human rights activist and a UK journalist so quickly. They would have simply stopped the protest and launched an investigation into the origins of the emails.
Luckily for Drew, the more of these fake emails that arrive, the more obvious it is that he is innocent. And the more attention this drama receives, the faster police can change their investigation: from investigating Drew’s alleged bomb threat to investigating Chinese netizens who (with or without Chinese government approval) campaign to silence critics abroad, including on UK soil.
There is nothing surprising about these developments. However, it is a lesson for both UK and other European police force in how to handle what is certainly going to become a more common, and in time more sophisticated, tool for suppressing human rights here in Europe itself.
Views expressed in this article are the opinions of the author and do not necessarily reflect the views of The Epoch Times.
